Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: BB_NO_NETWORK broken for git
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:31:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386257470.25847.26.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A09AA7.1020600@mlbassoc.com>

On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 08:24 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2013-12-05 08:09, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 07:09 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >> On 2013-12-05 06:50, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 05:18 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >>>> I try to use a local source mirror, fully populated with packages, so I
> >>>> can deliver a complete (no network required) bundle to my customers.  This
> >>>> has recently been broken.
> >>>>
> >>>> I can no longer use BB_NO_NETWORK=1 for git recipes, since this revision:
> >>>> commit 2354250a95eab484459f41f8715ae112295c2174
> >>>> Author: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> >>>> Date:   Mon Nov 18 17:17:16 2013 +0000
> >>>
> >>> Its actually the metadata that has the issue. The commit specified is
> >>> not on the master branch, its on the cross_prelink branch so the fetcher
> >>> is justifiably getting upset.
> >>>
> >>> When the network is present it does a complete reset to upstream and
> >>> then assumes the revision is present though which is something we might
> >>> want to fix too.
> >>>
> >>> For now we can at least correct the metadata to point at the right
> >>> branch. I've sent out a patch accordingly.
> >>
> >> Does this work for other git based repositories?  My example was for
> >> prelink, but it seems to fail for me for any SRC_URI that uses git.
> >> For example, matchbox-keyboard also fails under the same test scenario.
> >
> > Its the same problem. The commit referenced is not on master but on a
> > different branch. The URL needs fixing to point at the right branch.
> 
> So I just [luckily] picked two recipes that have incorrect SRC_URI??
> How many others will there be?  I'd wager most all since very few of
> them actually mention a branch, just a revision.

Most git trees use the master branch which is the default so most urls
are fine. 

I just added something to the fetcher to detect this (which I will
merge), then ran a world fetchall against OE-Core master.

We appear to have issues with lttng-{modules,ust,tools} and mx so its
far from "all" git recipes.

Cheers,

Richard





      reply	other threads:[~2013-12-05 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-05 12:18 BB_NO_NETWORK broken for git Gary Thomas
2013-12-05 13:50 ` Richard Purdie
2013-12-05 14:09   ` Gary Thomas
2013-12-05 15:09     ` Richard Purdie
2013-12-05 15:24       ` Gary Thomas
2013-12-05 15:31         ` Richard Purdie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1386257470.25847.26.camel@ted \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox