From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107A761227 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id rBAAX073021786; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:33:00 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DHC27iIGT_ls; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:33:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id rBAAWu8O021766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:32:58 GMT Message-ID: <1386671571.4332.1.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:32:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1386380546-13936-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1386589722.25847.79.camel@ted> <1386625884.25847.100.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] boost: Convert ??= weaker assingment to weak ?= assignment X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:33:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:11 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 09:34 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:48 AM, Richard Purdie > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > To illustrate why I'm struggling to follow this, "bitbake boost -e | > >> > grep BOOST_LIBS" on OE-Core does not show python in the list... > >> > > >> > >> > >> I can see it. Its on debian python is 2.7.3 > >> > >> kraj@builder:~$ cat /etc/os-release > >> PRETTY_NAME="Debian GNU/Linux 7 (wheezy)" > >> NAME="Debian GNU/Linux" > >> VERSION_ID="7" > >> VERSION="7 (wheezy)" > >> ID=debian > >> ANSI_COLOR="1;31" > >> HOME_URL="http://www.debian.org/" > >> SUPPORT_URL="http://www.debian.org/support/" > >> BUG_REPORT_URL="http://bugs.debian.org/" > > > > I doubt its host OS that is causing this, more likely something to do > > with the configuration you have (I'm using python 2.7.5+ on Ubuntu > > 13.10). Which DISTRO is this? Which layers are enabled? Which version of > > bitbake? > > > > all is latest from yesterday config wise I am building angstrom. now I did both > with angstrom and with OE-Core only and you are right it appears to > work with OE-Core alone > > see > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/6548349/ > > for angstrom version see > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/6548360/ > > > I will dig more into it a bit and see how PACKAGECONFIG can be bad in > angstrom's case Looking at those pastebins, it shows up as a python function since the "python" flag is set. That shouldn't do anything too bad to the variable though: python PACKAGECONFIG () { } In one case it has the value python, in the other it does not. Its all very odd. I wonder if "bitbake -e" shows it taking any value? There has to be something in the Angstrom setup which is triggering this... Cheers, Richard