From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A16E6AE9E for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id rBBERqxF014275; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:27:53 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bJRv2FguOlIS; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id rBBERnIi014270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:27:50 GMT Message-ID: <1386772064.4332.77.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Robert Yang Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:27:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <52A7DD0F.2050308@windriver.com> References: <5616775.7LhWvOXBE4@helios> <52A7DD0F.2050308@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Paul Eggleton , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/124] [dora] fixes for dora (cover leter only) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:28:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 11:33 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > > On 12/11/2013 08:52 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Paul Eggleton > > wrote: > >> > >>> Bruce Ashfield (10): > >>> kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot > >> > >> Wasn't there a problem with this patch? I can't recall if it was rectified > >> before or after it was merged to master. > >> > > > > Problem is elsewhere, there was more of documentation issue with > > Richard fixed in module.bbclass. > > this is ok. > > > > Yes, we need the patch, otherwise, perf will fail to build if the kernel > is mirrored from the sstate IIRC. You don't recall correctly this patch is broken, was reverted in master and should not be applied to a stable branch. Please drop it. Cheers, Richard