From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4121660D7F for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id rBNAgwEs011522; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:42:59 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HEVSOwKqzhz1; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:42:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id rBNAgpS7011514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:42:52 GMT Message-ID: <1387795367.11527.1.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "zhenhua.luo@freescale.com" Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:42:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: <090257310d9e463d93ee5cd5fd4d27fe@DM2PR03MB399.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> References: <090257310d9e463d93ee5cd5fd4d27fe@DM2PR03MB399.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: Why to make branch info is mandatory for non-master commit with latest bitbake X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:43:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 06:41 +0000, zhenhua.luo@freescale.com wrote: > Previously the branch name doesn't need to be defined when a > non-master branch commit is referred in recipe, this has been changed > in latest bitbake. > > Is this an intentional change? May I know the reason of the change if it is intentional? It was intentional and was triggered by this change: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=f19546e02d3318ee69fd0c34e21aa97b74c987ec which is a sanity test added to fix certain failure cases where a given revision wasn't on a specified branch. The bug was nasty since the fetcher was hitting the network in cases it shouldn't have been when a branch wasn't specified. Cheers, Richard