From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250236F322 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s1OH0EG0022340; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:00:15 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZnOW6Vpd2oo2; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:00:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s1OH07vB022337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:00:09 GMT Message-ID: <1393261200.31769.17.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Paul Eggleton Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:00:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: <19353110.0dHagEzKPJ@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <52C0CDD6.4030904@windriver.com> <5014991.yOqVctVWSl@helios> <19353110.0dHagEzKPJ@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Saul Wold , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/38] *-basic: rename to *-standardlinux X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:00:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 16:38 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 30 December 2013 12:59:26 Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Monday 30 December 2013 09:35:18 Robert Yang wrote: > > > I'm afraid that the standardlinux maybe a little confused with > > > linuxstdbase, bu I don't have any better idea about it. > > > > You could be right. I've thought for a long time about renaming this and > > haven't been able to come up with anything better. On the other hand, in our > > current configuration we are actually using the basic/standardlinux > > packagegroup as part of our LSB images; although that might not be the > > right thing to continue doing - LSB probably ought to be independent. > > > > FWIW, let's consider this particular patch as RFC, maybe someone else has a > > better idea of what to name it. I am very much convinced that "basic" is not > > the right name though. > > So, has anyone got any better ideas for the name of core-image-basic and > packagegroup-core-basic? > > The idea is that these are meant to contain things that you might have on a > more traditional or full-featured Linux system. Somehow "-traditionallinux" > doesn't really work either. "fulllinux"? "linuxcmdline"? Cheers, Richard