From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835C46F902 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s2ICuHwC025857; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:56:17 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id oBQ28FFM2gMj; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:56:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s2ICuBen025848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:56:12 GMT Message-ID: <1395147366.3808.70.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Koen Kooi Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:56:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: <23BFBADE-120F-4DBC-AABF-A9F802B8222C@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <1395143773-26375-1-git-send-email-Chase.Maupin@ti.com> <23BFBADE-120F-4DBC-AABF-A9F802B8222C@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] linaro-pm-qa-utils: Add power management test utils X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:56:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:29 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 18 mrt. 2014, om 12:56 heeft Chase Maupin het volgende geschreven: > > > * The power management test utilities from Linaro can be used > > to test multiple PM features such as cpufreq, cpuidle, thermal > > control and suspend operations. > > * These utilities are not platform specific and can be used by > > a broader base of users. > > PN should me 'pm-qa' or 'pm-qa-utils'. Agreed. > And it would fit better in meta-oe since it's not 'core' enough for oe-core. I'm open to discussion on that. Certainly if there is just one user, meta-oe would be appropriate. If these are generically useful and the plan is we integrate these into the larger automated test picture, oe-core may make sense. So if there a bigger picture plan here? Would these make sense in the broader picture? Cheers, Richard