From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0272A60D67 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 15:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s36FoRUT017029; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 16:50:28 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Ij44VYa9ZdQQ; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 16:50:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s36FoNw0017025 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 6 Apr 2014 16:50:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1396799417.24597.19.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Paul Barker Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 16:50:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1396313895-21200-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org> <20140403162312.GB3370@denix.org> <20140403223234.GH2132@jama> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Denys Dmytriyenko , openembedded-core Subject: Re: [dora][PATCH] opkg-utils: Update to latest git master X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 15:50:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 16:42 +0100, Paul Barker wrote: > On 3 April 2014 23:32, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > I haven't read whole discussion, but the idea of adding just one needed > > patch from the repo into oe-core metadata seems reasonable to me (unless > > someone wants to create dora branch in opkg-utils repo and cherry-pick > > just that one required commit there + update SRC_URI + SRCREV > > accordingly). > > I'd rather not keep a 'dora' branch in opkg-utils as I'd like it to > align with opkg and be independent of which build system is being > used. I think putting the patch into the dora branch of oe-core is the > best way forward as the change in question is tiny. In this specific case I'd tend to agree FWIW... Cheers, Richard