From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9A26F83E for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 22:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s37MMPES000796; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 23:22:25 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xI6nKtnG6ojl; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 23:22:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s37MMHsm000791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 23:22:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1396909331.24597.84.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Denys Dmytriyenko Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:22:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20140407210549.GI3370@denix.org> References: <1396324451-26983-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org> <20140406224639.GD3370@denix.org> <5342C918.5030307@linux.intel.com> <20140407210549.GI3370@denix.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] udev-extraconf: update mount.sh to use /run/media instead of /media X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 22:22:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 17:05 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > I understand the timing concern and am fine waiting another week for when 1.7 > window opens. > > But I'm slightly confused as to since when OE-Core is concerned about breaking > bbappends in other layers? I guess some layers are not created equal, eh? :) The question is more one of timing. I don't think its reasonable that we break things like that between -rc2 and -rc3 of 1.6 without a better reason... I'm even nervous changing the sstate checksums but I think the CONFFILES change does warrant that for example. Cheers, Richard