From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (unknown [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA8060897 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 22:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s48M9r3N006907; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:09:53 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id D0N81SKzyXpn; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:09:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s48M9kvH006903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 8 May 2014 23:09:48 +0100 Message-ID: <1399586980.31891.79.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Gary Robertson Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:09:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1397851967-24110-1-git-send-email-gary.robertson@linaro.org> <1398272388-3326-1-git-send-email-gary.robertson@linaro.org> <1398272388-3326-2-git-send-email-gary.robertson@linaro.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Mike Holmes , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: bump version 0.87 => 0.89 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:10:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 16:24 -0500, Gary Robertson wrote: > I am regrettably new at patch submissions within the Linux / Open > Source community, so please forgive my breach of etiquette if I abuse > the balance between persistence and peskiness. > > I submitted the first version of this recipe patch on 18 APR and > received prompt suggestions for improvement. > However since amending the patch to incorporate those improvements and > re-submitting the patch on 24 APR, I have heard no further comments or > responses. > > So I am pinging the list once more to check the status of the patch. > Please let me know if additional work must be done to make the patch > acceptable. > > (BTW, I authored the patch to cyclictest and Anders Roxell authored > the patch to update the recipe with the new version of the rt-tests. > I subsequently submitted the recipe patch on his behalf... that is why > his name appears as author of the patch itself.) We have tried this in some of the test builds. My memory says something failed and we hence didn't merge it but I'm not remembering which version of the series that was, or what the failure was. Saul may remember. We do try and reply to the patches where we identify failures with pointers to the logs but this one has probably fallen through the cracks, sorry. If we can't remember we'll try it in master-next or mut and see if we can remember what the issue was... Cheers, Richard