From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (unknown [66.111.4.29]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC95960173 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 20:54:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCB021881 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:54:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 May 2014 16:54:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=axSlemk4v6H4AeikYAfmZrUUaEs=; b=MUU9HTAMELxoh5Nr4vmCHhE5rGhR 4hZsJmYudhNzWof8yrAHSTEUEjSPPuzpEhWJLGhkcAgv+y9JzQ3Ue9CCUiUtJk9m qnL4Lba9aH1pIY5N26n+6/CmhRDHhpteuuczxC1oRPpypTInTHyPf9Rg+96tlNH4 rPh9J/kpUpUIV9Q= X-Sasl-enc: kBiXfaxpwz9Oxdfex8nKRVYQ3yRghwTgo1ZBHqnLj08P 1399668893 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [66.31.18.51]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B90DEC0000C; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:54:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 20:50:51 +0000 From: Colin Walters To: Mark Hatle Message-Id: <1399668891.22845.1@mail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <536D3C0F.1040605@windriver.com> References: <1399591490-13000-1-git-send-email-mark.hatle@windriver.com> <536CF0E6.9060800@windriver.com> <1399664736.22845.0@mail.messagingengine.com> <536D3C0F.1040605@windriver.com> X-Mailer: geary/0.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalDate: Fri, 09 May 2014 20:50:51 -0004 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] base-files: Add /run/lock as a standard directory X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 20:54:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Mark Hatle wrote: > > Certain system configurations may require parts of the /run > filesystem to not always be on tmpfs. (Some situations where you > have a lot of disk, but limited ram for instance.. using tmpfs will > potentially put your system into a low memory state, or you might not > have enough tmpfs to run the system properly.) I understand not doing /tmp-on-tmpfs, but /run? Fix the parts of userspace that are allocating significant memory there. And if you're really not mounting /run as tmpfs, I hope you're ensuring it's emptied immediately after mounting. > /run is one of the directories that needs to be investigated. Is > there actually anything there that may be desirable to persist from > one boot to the next? No. It not being persistent is part of the API contract. http://lwn.net/Articles/436012/