From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Gary Robertson <gary.robertson@linaro.org>
Cc: Mike Holmes <mike.holmes@linaro.org>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: bump version 0.87 => 0.89
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 18:05:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399827934.31891.119.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399586980.31891.79.camel@ted>
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 23:09 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 16:24 -0500, Gary Robertson wrote:
>
> > I am regrettably new at patch submissions within the Linux / Open
> > Source community, so please forgive my breach of etiquette if I abuse
> > the balance between persistence and peskiness.
> >
> > I submitted the first version of this recipe patch on 18 APR and
> > received prompt suggestions for improvement.
> > However since amending the patch to incorporate those improvements and
> > re-submitting the patch on 24 APR, I have heard no further comments or
> > responses.
> >
> > So I am pinging the list once more to check the status of the patch.
> > Please let me know if additional work must be done to make the patch
> > acceptable.
> >
> > (BTW, I authored the patch to cyclictest and Anders Roxell authored
> > the patch to update the recipe with the new version of the rt-tests.
> > I subsequently submitted the recipe patch on his behalf... that is why
> > his name appears as author of the patch itself.)
>
> We have tried this in some of the test builds. My memory says something
> failed and we hence didn't merge it but I'm not remembering which
> version of the series that was, or what the failure was. Saul may
> remember.
>
> We do try and reply to the patches where we identify failures with
> pointers to the logs but this one has probably fallen through the
> cracks, sorry.
>
> If we can't remember we'll try it in master-next or mut and see if we
> can remember what the issue was...
I merged this as I thought we were ok, then we found:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-world/builds/85/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio
so a patch to fix that would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-11 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-18 20:12 [PATCH] rt-tests: bump version 0.87 => 0.89 gary.robertson
2014-04-18 20:12 ` gary.robertson
2014-04-18 20:15 ` Khem Raj
2014-04-18 20:17 ` Saul Wold
2014-04-23 16:59 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] " gary.robertson
2014-04-23 16:59 ` [PATCH] " gary.robertson
2014-05-08 21:24 ` Gary Robertson
2014-05-08 22:09 ` Richard Purdie
2014-05-11 17:05 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2014-04-24 22:09 ` [PATCH V3 0/1] " gary.robertson
2014-04-24 22:09 ` [PATCH V3 1/1] " gary.robertson
2014-05-09 21:59 ` Saul Wold
2014-05-14 4:08 ` Saul Wold
2014-05-14 13:04 ` Gary Robertson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1399827934.31891.119.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gary.robertson@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.holmes@linaro.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox