From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7413261A47 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2013 08:42:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,905,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="356835956" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.59]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2013 08:42:28 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Nicolas Dechesne Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:42:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1402287.LPEgl0HhT9@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.3 (Linux/3.8.0-25-generic; KDE/4.10.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Issues with Qt5/mesa and eglfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:42:28 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Nicolas, On Thursday 20 June 2013 09:46:36 Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > resending on proper mailling list, +cc Paul as it's dylan related. > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Nicolas Dechesne < > > nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> wrote: > > hi there, > > > > i am trying to build Qt5/meta-qt5 with dylan branch in a non X11 distro, > > and i got failures during the Qt5 configure step (when auto-detecting EGL > > feature). Looking into the issue, the good news is that it seems to be > > fixed in oe-core/master with: > > > > d7033f4 mesa: upgrade to 9.1.3 > > > > thanks to this : > > Add EGL-Mutate-NativeDisplayType-depending-on-config.patch to build > > > > correctly in > > > > a non-X11 environment. > > > > Drop dont-fail-if-libX11-isnt-installed.patch and > > fix-egl-compilation-without-x11-headers.patch as they were backports. > > > > Would you guys consider 'backporting' this patch onto dylan a viable > > thing? I will make the backport, but it would be nice if you can confirm > > that it can be merged in dylan. I wasn't watching closely but my impression is there were a large number of changes associated with the mesa upgrade. Is the upgrade itself necessary for the fix? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre