From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A306AC69 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s6NGCnt6003485; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:12:49 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3ZGwNxqY20hz; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:12:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s6NGCgJn003130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:12:43 +0100 Message-ID: <1406131962.22985.127.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:12:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: if a layer doesn't provide any conf/ or classes/ files, any need for BBPATH? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:13:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 20:21 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i just noticed that the meta-oe/meta-filesystems layer provides no > (additional) conf/ files or classes/ files. so in a case like that, is > there any need to add that layer info to BBPATH in its layer.conf > file? > > conversely, if a layer contains no .bb or .bbappend files, does it > need to be included in BBFILES? It doesn't need to, no. Convention is to leave it around to make it easy to add them later since it doesn't hurt much either. Cheers, Richard