From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DAD707A3 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s6OC8KLI006139; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:08:20 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5FHZTBCqAFzQ; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:08:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s6OC8HKK006125 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:08:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1406203692.27697.6.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:08:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mention package_tar packaging in local.conf.sample X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 12:08:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 05:10 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day > > --- > > is this the appropriate comment for tarball packaging? > > diff --git a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > index 555f8db..a200002 100644 > --- a/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > +++ b/meta/conf/local.conf.sample > @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ MACHINE ??= "qemux86" > # - 'package_deb' for debian style deb files > # - 'package_ipk' for ipk files are used by opkg (a debian style embedded package manager) > # - 'package_rpm' for rpm style packages > -# E.g.: PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_rpm package_deb package_ipk" > +# - 'package_tar' for tarball packages > +# E.g.: PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_rpm package_deb package_ipk package_tar" > # We default to ipk: > PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_ipk" > The class is pretty useless, lets leave this one less documented ;-) I keep thinking we should delete it instead to be honest... Cheers, Richard