From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1496FED8 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu4) with ESMTP id s6PGxiuE032525; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:59:58 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bvt02y9Nj-QR; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:59:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] (rpvlan0 [192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s6PGxuW9032541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:59:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1406307590.27697.41.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:59:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1402915976-12506-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <53B66F26.5000800@communistcode.co.uk> <53C7AE4F.5060809@communistcode.co.uk> <1405596838.3668.14.camel@ted> <53C7B5F1.1030302@communistcode.co.uk> <53C7B7B1.8010301@communistcode.co.uk> <1405600745.3668.15.camel@ted> <1405601311.3668.16.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] wget: use GnuTLS instead of OpenSSL X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:00:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 09:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > >> So why on earth is it looking at /usr/lib/libgnutls.so? > > > > Total guess by try adding EXTRA_OECONF += "--without-libgnutls-prefix" > > The problem is due to use of > > AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS([gnutls] since we use DESTDIR while cross > compiling, so above option should have worked I dont know why it did > not but you could try > > --with-libgnutls-prefix="" > > if that doesnt work either then may be replace use of > AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS with AC_CHECK_LIB I looked at the generated files and the --without option just stops it looking in the wrong places. It seems counter-intuitive compared to how these options usually work but does seem to fix the problem... Cheers, Richard