From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7159770B36 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s7BAQfHV031761; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:26:41 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QrkZ54vNv5yW; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:26:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s7BAQYiC031756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:26:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1407752794.22187.3.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Marek Vasut Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:26:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201408081422.19749.marex@denx.de> References: <1407438629-13369-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <3FD4F336-0653-4641-899F-DDD2AF178A20@dominion.thruhere.net> <201408081422.19749.marex@denx.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Koen Kooi , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] Yocto: Install full set of python modules in Qt SDK toolchain X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:26:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 14:22 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Friday, August 08, 2014 at 07:22:04 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Since 'yocto' is a project like freedesktop.org your commit message doesn't > > make sense, it should be something like: > > > > meta-toolchain-qt: Install full set of python modules > > Got it, Saul also told me so. I will wait a bit for some more feedback and > repost with corrections, OK ? Is this approach I took here even correct please ? I'd really like to see a packagegroup defined somewhere with this list of python modules which the various recipes can then reference... Cheers, Richard