From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6B670F90 for ; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 11:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s7NB4Ymm015704; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:04:34 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tQFdYVitW_Zu; Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:04:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id s7NB4WhT015700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:04:34 +0100 Message-ID: <1408791873.5457.16.camel@ted> From: Richard Purdie To: Christopher Larson Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:04:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1408653988.1669.116.camel@ted> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/oe/package_manager: Add utils function for multiprocess execution X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 11:04:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 17:57 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > Our usage of multitprocessing is problematic. In particular, > there is a bug > in python 2.7 multiprocessing where signals are not handled > until command > completion instead of immediately. > > This looks good, but the subject is misleading, in my opinion: > "lib/oe/package_manager: Add utils function for multiprocess > execution". It should probably either mention both utils and > package_manager, or be split into two commits. Good point, I tweaked before merging, thanks. It was the (bad) result of rearranging a few commits. Cheers, Richard