From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Te2Jj-00064y-TM for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:30:08 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2012 03:15:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,184,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="224194272" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.249]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2012 03:15:50 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: Marko Lindqvist Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:15:49 +0000 Message-ID: <1410350.L5GQZe9fm8@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.3 (Linux/3.5.0-18-generic; KDE/4.9.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1354127226-24827-1-git-send-email-cazfi74@gmail.com> <50B66559.5010402@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] readline: apply upstream patches X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:30:08 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 28 November 2012 21:31:44 Marko Lindqvist wrote: > On 28 November 2012 21:26, Saul Wold wrote: > > I was going to add that I think the apply=yes is default and therefore not > > required here. > > Is it for files that do not have .patch suffix? With my first quick > test it didn't work. Correct, it is still needed in the case where there is no .patch or .diff extension. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre