From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sstatesig: incremental dump lockedsigs
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:57:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410886651.14624.62.camel@ted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7654c9c712e2a736e7d177186e16b6a261ca7fc.1410446513.git.hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 23:04 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> While including an existed lockedsigs file to build from
> locked sstate-cache, and we want to incremental build the
> locked sstate-cache. Config with:
> ...
> SIGGEN_DUMP_LOCKEDSIGS = '1'
> SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_CONFIG = "${TOPDIR}/locked-sigs.inc"
> require ${SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_CONFIG}
> ...
> So we support to dump lockedsigs file incrementally
>
> Since we improve to handle locking of multiple machines and
> add a new SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_TYPES variable which lists the
> package architectures to load in. We should add package
> architectures as type to self.lockedsigs to reflect that.
> Such as:
> {recipename:{task:{hash1}}} --> {type:{recipename:{task:{hash1}}}}
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
> ---
> meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
I've stared long and hard at this patch and I simply don't understand
why we need to complicate the structure of the lockedsigs variable.
I understand wanting to generate an incremental sig file, that much is
fine, I just don't like the other seemingly unrelated change.
Regardless, they should be split into separate patches.
Can you explain more about what you're trying to do?
Cheers,
Richard
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py b/meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py
> index c9edd80..8b491a6 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/sstatesig.py
> @@ -65,12 +65,15 @@ def sstate_lockedsigs(d):
> sigs = {}
> types = (d.getVar("SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_TYPES", True) or "").split()
> for t in types:
> + if t not in sigs:
> + sigs[t] = {}
> +
> lockedsigs = (d.getVar("SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_%s" % t, True) or "").split()
> for ls in lockedsigs:
> pn, task, h = ls.split(":", 2)
> - if pn not in sigs:
> - sigs[pn] = {}
> - sigs[pn][task] = h
> + if pn not in sigs[t]:
> + sigs[t][pn] = {}
> + sigs[t][pn][task] = h
> return sigs
>
> class SignatureGeneratorOEBasic(bb.siggen.SignatureGeneratorBasic):
> @@ -115,10 +118,14 @@ class SignatureGeneratorOEBasicHash(bb.siggen.SignatureGeneratorBasicHash):
> recipename = dataCache.pkg_fn[fn]
> self.lockedpnmap[fn] = recipename
> self.lockedhashfn[fn] = dataCache.hashfn[fn]
> - if recipename in self.lockedsigs:
> - if task in self.lockedsigs[recipename]:
> +
> + t = self.lockedhashfn[fn].split(" ")[1].split(":")[5]
> + if t not in self.lockedsigs:
> + return h
> + if recipename in self.lockedsigs[t]:
> + if task in self.lockedsigs[t][recipename]:
> k = fn + "." + task
> - h_locked = self.lockedsigs[recipename][task]
> + h_locked = self.lockedsigs[t][recipename][task]
> self.lockedhashes[k] = h_locked
> self.taskhash[k] = h_locked
> #bb.warn("Using %s %s %s" % (recipename, task, h))
> @@ -137,6 +144,19 @@ class SignatureGeneratorOEBasicHash(bb.siggen.SignatureGeneratorBasicHash):
> return
> super(bb.siggen.SignatureGeneratorBasicHash, self).dump_sigtask(fn, task, stampbase, runtime)
>
> + def update_lockedsigs(self, type, recipename, task, hash):
> + if type not in self.lockedsigs:
> + self.lockedsigs[type] = {}
> +
> + if recipename not in self.lockedsigs[type]:
> + self.lockedsigs[type][recipename] = {}
> +
> + if task not in self.lockedsigs[type][recipename]:
> + self.lockedsigs[type][recipename][task] = hash
> + elif hash != self.lockedsigs[type][recipename][task]:
> + bb.warn('Conflict %s %s %s (new %s, old %s)' %
> + (type, recipename, task, hash, self.lockedsigs[type][recipename][task]))
> +
> def dump_lockedsigs(self, where_to_dump=None):
> if not where_to_dump:
> where_to_dump = os.getcwd() + "/locked-sigs.inc"
> @@ -146,30 +166,33 @@ class SignatureGeneratorOEBasicHash(bb.siggen.SignatureGeneratorBasicHash):
> for k in self.runtaskdeps:
> fn = k.rsplit(".",1)[0]
> t = self.lockedhashfn[fn].split(" ")[1].split(":")[5]
> - if t not in types:
> - types[t] = []
> - types[t].append(k)
> + recipename = self.lockedpnmap[fn]
> + task = k.rsplit(".",1)[1]
> + hash = self.taskhash[k]
> + self.update_lockedsigs(t, recipename, task, hash)
>
> with open(where_to_dump, "w") as f:
> - for t in types:
> - f.write('SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_%s = "\\\n' % t)
> - types[t].sort()
> - sortedk = sorted(types[t], key=lambda k: self.lockedpnmap[k.rsplit(".",1)[0]])
> - for k in sortedk:
> - fn = k.rsplit(".",1)[0]
> - task = k.rsplit(".",1)[1]
> - if k not in self.taskhash:
> - continue
> - f.write(" " + self.lockedpnmap[fn] + ":" + task + ":" + self.taskhash[k] + " \\\n")
> + for type in sorted(self.lockedsigs):
> + f.write('SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_%s = "\\\n' % type)
> +
> + for recipename in sorted(self.lockedsigs[type]):
> + for task in sorted(self.lockedsigs[type][recipename]):
> + hash = self.lockedsigs[type][recipename][task]
> + f.write(" " + recipename + ":" + task + ":" + hash + " \\\n")
> f.write(' "\n')
> - f.write('SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_TYPES_%s = "%s"' % (self.machine, " ".join(types.keys())))
> +
> + f.write('SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_TYPES_%s = "%s"' % (self.machine, " ".join(self.lockedsigs.keys())))
>
> def checkhashes(self, missed, ret, sq_fn, sq_task, sq_hash, sq_hashfn, d):
> checklevel = d.getVar("SIGGEN_LOCKEDSIGS_CHECK_LEVEL", True)
> for task in range(len(sq_fn)):
> if task not in ret:
> - for pn in self.lockedsigs:
> - if sq_hash[task] in self.lockedsigs[pn].itervalues():
> + t = sq_hashfn[task].split(" ")[1].split(":")[5]
> + if t not in self.lockedsigs:
> + continue
> +
> + for pn in self.lockedsigs[t]:
> + if sq_hash[task] in self.lockedsigs[t][pn].itervalues():
> self.checkmsgs.append("Locked sig is set for %s:%s (%s) yet not in sstate cache?"
> % (pn, sq_task[task], sq_hash[task]))
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-11 15:04 [PATCH 0/5] Add support for locked down sstate Hongxu Jia
2014-09-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] Richard Purdie : sstatesig/sstate: Add support for locked down sstate cache usage Hongxu Jia
2014-09-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] Richard Purdie : sstatesig: Improve to handle locking of multiple machines Hongxu Jia
2014-09-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] Richard Purdie : siggen/runqueue/bitbake-worker: Improve siggen data transfer interface Hongxu Jia
2014-09-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] sstate/sstatesig: optimize the support for locked down sstate cache usage Hongxu Jia
2014-09-16 17:00 ` Richard Purdie
2014-09-17 2:46 ` Hongxu Jia
2014-09-11 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] sstatesig: incremental dump lockedsigs Hongxu Jia
2014-09-16 16:57 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2014-09-17 6:26 ` Hongxu Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1410886651.14624.62.camel@ted \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hongxu.jia@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox