From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A2560233 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 10:30:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,762,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="593122427" Received: from justinda-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.13.67]) ([10.255.13.67]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 08:09:53 -0700 Message-ID: <1413904192.3669.6.camel@empanada.home.network> From: Tom Zanussi To: Philip Balister Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:09:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54454A41.7090900@balister.org> References: <54454A41.7090900@balister.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 (3.8.5-2.fc19) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: wic debug suggestions X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:12:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 13:45 -0400, Philip Balister wrote: > I'm trying to make an sd card using the sdimage-bootpart.wks file. I've > made an image and dd'ed it to a card. The card has a good vfat > partition, but the ext4 partition won't mount. Looks like bad > superblock. I can format the partition manually, so partitions seem OK > and card works. > > Does anyone have any suggestions for debugging this? > If you think there's a problem in the way wic is creating the partitions, I'd suggest using the wic --debug option, which will show you all the details of the underlying commands used to create the partitions. If that doesn't show anything obvious, please create a bug report and be sure to include myself and Maciej, who added the new sdimage-bootpart functionality you're having trouble with, in case it turns out not to be some more generic problem in the tool. Thanks, Tom > Philip