From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DEE723B3 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id sB5I2dlj009016; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:03:32 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Zgkr8FK6wWBa; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:03:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id sB5I3Jub009040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 18:03:31 GMT Message-ID: <1417802636.5102.9.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Martin Jansa Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:03:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20141204214800.GF2453@jama> References: <1417087023-29423-1-git-send-email-gshastri@juniper.net> <969F26A8BAB325438E7EB80D3C3134FB2F3C5556@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> <1417722559.15614.58.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <20141204214800.GF2453@jama> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" , "gmshastri@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] When building with systemd based image, udev-hwdb postinstall script will fail because of not passing correct CPU option. So fix it by passing correct QEMU_OPTIONS. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:04:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 22:48 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > Thanks for fixing that. Would it make sense to add comment saying that > nobody is expected to use "QEMU_EXTRAOPTIONS" directly and that they > aren't overrides (so that nobody makes the same mistake as I did). Yes, I've done that, and fixed up another reference in the qemuwrapper-cross so things are more consistent... Cheers, Richard