From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Upgrades for comply Intel Graphics Stack Release 2014Q3
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:15:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418228127.22903.61.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKp2nSb5qMVPW6tfG9Wm3zwuopPDt4Hm4+EY+eBjYyS4Jw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 18:19 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 9 December 2014 at 18:14, Aníbal Limón <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't know, maybe Ross knows?.
> >
> >
> > I ask for Piglit results to verify that approx 95% passes as that's the
> > expected pass rate. I don't bother tracking the exact count as how it
> > changes as there's almost ten thousand tests and at some point you have to
> > let upstream deal with this.
>
> What is the point in having a tool for regression test if it is not tracked?
Going forward, the plan is to track this FWIW. Right now that is a work
in progress as the test result collection piece is missing. Its also a
chicken and egg problem, you can't track things until you have some
tests to track. Things are being run manually to check for regressions
in a coarse manner too and this is better than not at all.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 23:18 [PATCHv2 0/3] Upgrades for comply Intel Graphics Stack Release 2014Q3 Aníbal Limón
2014-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] libdrm: Upgrade to 2.4.58 Aníbal Limón
2014-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] mesa: Upgrade to 10.3.4 Aníbal Limón
2014-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCHv3 3/3] xorg-xserver: Upgrade to 1.16.2 Aníbal Limón
2014-12-08 9:29 ` [PATCHv2 0/3] Upgrades for comply Intel Graphics Stack Release 2014Q3 Nicolas Dechesne
2014-12-09 17:20 ` Kamble, Nitin A
2014-12-09 18:14 ` Aníbal Limón
2014-12-09 20:06 ` Burton, Ross
2014-12-09 20:19 ` Otavio Salvador
2014-12-10 11:43 ` Burton, Ross
2014-12-10 16:15 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2014-12-10 16:17 ` Otavio Salvador
2014-12-10 16:21 ` Richard Purdie
2014-12-10 8:08 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2014-12-10 11:33 ` Burton, Ross
2014-12-10 15:46 ` Aníbal Limón
2014-12-10 23:43 ` Kamble, Nitin A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1418228127.22903.61.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox