From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A0A65C66 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t07860OW015465; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:06:48 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7funSQN1KPeQ; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:06:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t0786awV015492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 08:06:47 GMT Message-ID: <1420618033.25779.56.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Robert Yang Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 08:07:13 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1420592855-20473-1-git-send-email-liezhi.yang@windriver.com> References: <1420592855-20473-1-git-send-email-liezhi.yang@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] package.bbclass: omit .pyc and .pyo file X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 08:07:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 17:07 -0800, Robert Yang wrote: > We should not ship .pyc or .pyo file, but there are a few packages > ship .pyc, should we: Why should we not ship them? Doesn't python create these at runtime if they're not present? What happens on a read only filesystem? I'm sure we've had issues raised by someone with a read only filesystem before FWIW. I agree there is probably an issue here but deleting them may not be the best option. I'm open to ideas though. Cheers, Richard