From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA2265C75 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t16BgsSI028886; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:42:54 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hmuLl-72xKMz; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:42:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t16Bgg1i028881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:42:54 GMT Message-ID: <1423222962.20217.13.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Paul Eggleton Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:42:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4479188.gEPuv5Te0O@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1423085616-6729-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <4479188.gEPuv5Te0O@peggleto-mobl5.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bitbake.conf: don't remove WARN_QA and ERROR_QA from hashes" X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:43:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 10:41 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2015 21:33:36 Ross Burton wrote: > > It turns out that changing WARN_QA and ERROR_QA results in do_configure's QA > > postfunc re-executing, so changing a QA test results in a complete rebuild. > > Hmm, shouldn't we be fixing this? (e.g. with vardepsexclude). Well, either the tests should rerun or they shouldn't. I'm not sure "the configure tests don't" would be an improvement? Cheers, Richard