Re: [PATCH 1/1] package_manager.py: fix rpm based do_rootfs failed while IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " python3"

Hongxu Jia
2014-10-31T09:30:37Z

On 10/31/2014 04:50 PM, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 03:05:58PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
>> While a pkg name (such as python3) not existed in variable
>> PACKAGES, but provided by another pkg (such as python-core),
>> in this situation, rpm based do_rootfs could not search it in
>> the feeds.
>>
>> The fix is to invoke 'smart query --provides' to do the search
>> if the feeds search failed. We don't drop the feeds search,
>> because the smart query search is too slow, and the feeds
>> search is fast and could work well with most pkgs.
>>
>> [YOCTO #6918]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
>> index ffb83b2..d5704e6 100644
>> --- a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
>> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
>> @@ -671,6 +671,23 @@ class RpmPM(PackageManager):
>>
>> return ""
>>
>> + def _search_pkg_provider_in_smart(self, pkg, feed_archs):
>> + output = self._invoke_smart('query --provides %s' % pkg) or ""
>> + for provider in output.split('\n'):
>> + # Filter out the line which is empty or start with space
>> + if provider.strip() == '' or provider[0] == ' ':
>> + continue
>> +
>> + for arch in feed_archs:
>> + arch = '@' + arch.replace('-', '_')
>> + if arch in provider:
>> + # First found is best match
>> + # bb.note("%s -> %s" % (pkg, provider))
> Why not remove the bb.note above since it's commented out?

The commented out line is left for debug purpose, it is helpful
to trace what changed when you debug.

If it caused confusion, I will remove it.

>
>> + return provider
>> +
>> + return ''
>> +
>> +
>> '''
>> Translate the OE multilib format names to the RPM/Smart format names
>> It searched the RPM/Smart format names in probable multilib feeds first,
>> @@ -693,6 +710,8 @@ class RpmPM(PackageManager):
>> feed_archs = self.ml_prefix_list[mlib]
>> new_pkg = self._search_pkg_name_in_feeds(subst, feed_archs)
>> if not new_pkg:
>> + new_pkg = self._search_pkg_provider_in_smart(subst, feed_archs)
>> + if not new_pkg:
> This entire construct:
> ...
> new_pkg = self._search_pkg_name_in_feeds(subst, feed_archs)
> if not new_pkg:
> new_pkg = self._search_pkg_provider_in_smart(subst, feed_archs)
> if not new_pkg:
> ...
>
> could be replaced with:
> ...
> new_pkg = self._search_pkg_name_in_feeds(subst, feed_archs) or \
> self._search_pkg_provider_in_smart(subst, feed_archs)
> if not new_pkg:
> ...
>
> I'd say it looks cleaner but it's a matter of personal taste. :)

Fine, I will improve it.

V2 incoming

//Hongxu

>
>> # Failed to translate, package not found!
>> err_msg = '%s not found in the %s feeds (%s).\n' % \
>> (pkg, mlib, " ".join(feed_archs))
>> @@ -711,6 +730,8 @@ class RpmPM(PackageManager):
>> default_archs = self.ml_prefix_list['default']
>> new_pkg = self._search_pkg_name_in_feeds(pkg, default_archs)
>> if not new_pkg:
>> + new_pkg = self._search_pkg_provider_in_smart(pkg, default_archs)
>> + if not new_pkg:
> ditto
>
> laurentiu