From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABD8606E8;
	Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:52:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id
	t1IBq39e023709; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:52:03 GMT
Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id NkZ7QESWTrew; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:52:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id
	t1IBpn7q023689
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT);
	Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:52:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1424260309.25541.23.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:51:49 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BCB8524E-91CB-41F6-83C0-7B90E60BC82D@gmail.com>
References: <CAMKF1souj1-FLTjkQb0y8myTiKMJyNeAa7wiM5-pW1fz0EtheA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJTo0LaN3HMhjrpii2pPbJw5zWbywgr1keZe=iQmuKFMFFf=gQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKF1sq8NsuNYZDQRPtXruBeRndOP+0qwBuTO2ahb6q-fS8XGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJTo0LYpKbwOHg-DBMJycy+KNayTCsnhToJR8K-REKZ2jxhnhw@mail.gmail.com>
	<EA0C9DE9-9E5F-4B74-8464-138895268F2F@gmail.com>
	<CAJTo0LbSFesauhA_H39Znd07SR5JCs45izy2us=cFWVGXtW8hg@mail.gmail.com>
	<80920FD0-CA08-45D7-9A41-3971FB2D58D7@gmail.com>
	<CAJTo0LbqTrQzk0KeHDxYnmtZrrFdZD12DWrjA=Y4RtbQzwM0ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKF1sr7bYpKqzTmvX5rCuYc-Rb2se7Vsrr4aYA43E_b1Z=vWA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACS+7ZRNm2Y0SJn76imF6DNoEsL2+ppC1zG45iGspOmL0EN0BQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKF1sqjQm+n5xKfS0utm9B9h_S+RYWrgnGUCboRNCk5XSUmzg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1423908404.20217.100.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
	<CAMKF1sofS7MteZnPsTYRNAcMwrrh=T3FP+ASmAOGDMhcwyXB4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1424245575.25541.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
	<BCB8524E-91CB-41F6-83C0-7B90E60BC82D@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>,
	openembeded-devel <Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:52:05 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 01:01 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> OK thats why I am not seeing it on my qemux86 build. 
> 
> this leaves us with only one problem - glibc/qemuarm issue
> 
> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/8679/
> 
> I have seen this error with eglibc-2.19 and glibc 2.20 as well on x86 and arm as well in cases when using
> toolchain from sstate and rebuilding glibc with that. I assume this could be  unrelated to glibc upgrade
> and may be a latent problem. Could be missing dependency on a native tool or some such. I have been attributing it to gold
> but that just might have been a red herring.
> 
> I will see if I can get to reproduce it.

I tried another build with the three patches from your oe-core contrib
branch applied. Error report out is:

http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Search/?items=10&query=b75fed99f2aa86b49844dd0cf06991767f6f26d3

i.e. we're still seeing SSE errors in glibc builds. Am I missing some
patches or something?

Cheers,

Richard