From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B3B706B3 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t1NA8vQ2020278; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:08:57 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id l1CYC5LAnH3x; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:08:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t1NA8h9I020260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:08:55 GMT Message-ID: <1424686123.11836.76.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Bruce Ashfield Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:08:43 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54EAB6E3.5010804@windriver.com> References: <1424610251.11836.74.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <54EAB6E3.5010804@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Hart, Darren" , openembedded-core Subject: Re: linux-yocto task performance numbers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:09:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 00:13 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > Was this the 3.19 kernel you used for these stats ? I just ran a quick > test (i.e. not with buildstats) with my latest kernel tree (on my > crappy I/O laptop) and get the following: > > % time bitbake -f -c kernel_configme linux-yocto > > real 0m7.378s > user 0m4.356s > sys 0m5.553s > > > So I'm showing 7 seconds, versus 45 in your run .. and I'm showing: > > real 0m26.371s > user 0m12.561s > sys 0m19.534s > > For do_patch (and that is before the already in progress changes that > I mentioned earlier). > > Just with those differences alone, sounds like we should log this in > bugzilla and put the details of the configuration and build machines in > there .. since I'll need to isolate what is causing those extra long > runs, and ensure that everything is pushed to the various trees. I think I messed up and ran against a slightly different version. The numbers confirmed with 3.19 are: do_bundle_initramfs: Elapsed time: 0.03 seconds do_compile: Elapsed time: 78.07 seconds do_compile_kernelmodules: Elapsed time: 35.23 seconds do_configure: Elapsed time: 0.60 seconds do_deploy: Elapsed time: 14.39 seconds do_fetch: Elapsed time: 0.04 seconds do_install: Elapsed time: 2.02 seconds do_kernel_checkout: Elapsed time: 10.67 seconds do_kernel_configcheck: Elapsed time: 8.03 seconds do_kernel_configme: Elapsed time: 70.41 seconds do_kernel_link_vmlinux: Elapsed time: 0.03 seconds do_package: Elapsed time: 33.48 seconds do_packagedata: Elapsed time: 2.30 seconds do_package_qa: Elapsed time: 4.94 seconds do_package_write_ipk: Elapsed time: 68.72 seconds do_package_write_rpm: Elapsed time: 44.33 seconds do_patch: Elapsed time: 56.43 seconds do_populate_lic: Elapsed time: 0.14 seconds do_populate_sysroot: Elapsed time: 0.16 seconds do_shared_workdir: Elapsed time: 0.04 seconds do_sizecheck: Elapsed time: 0.03 seconds do_strip: Elapsed time: 0.03 seconds do_uboot_mkimage: Elapsed time: 0.02 seconds do_unpack: Elapsed time: 5.06 seconds do_validate_branches: Elapsed time: 0.69 seconds To get the numbers: bitbake linux-yocto -c cleansstate bitbake linux-yocto $ (cd tmp/buildstats/linux-yocto-qemux86-64/201502230954/linux-yocto-3.19+gitAUTOINC+8897ef68b3_43b9eced9b-r0/; grep El * | sed s/linux-yocto-3.19+gitAUTOINC+8897ef68b3_43b9eced9b-r0// | sed s/^.*:://) So configcheck is better but the other times still seem high. Cheers, Richard