From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8146C734E6 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t2O9Z9TC013955; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:35:09 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3wQytwVzwb7Q; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:35:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t2O9YvOt013942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:35:08 GMT Message-ID: <1427189697.14020.24.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: "Musat, George L" Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:34:57 +0000 In-Reply-To: <042E875E1B5D414CA9BB78B7D4FA691C2650EF29@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1427102643-19366-1-git-send-email-george.l.musat@intel.com> <042E875E1B5D414CA9BB78B7D4FA691C2650EF29@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] oeqa/selftest: New auto bitbake test for poky tiny. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:35:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 11:54 +0000, Musat, George L wrote: > I am viewing this as a build test for the poky-tiny image, that checks > if the build was fine by booting it and checking that it booted fine > and checking that it’s indeed a tiny, rather than a runtime test. Ross does have a point, our other images automatically run their testimage tests after each rootfs is constructed as part of the normal build. Why wouldn't we do this for the tiny images too? Cheers, Richard