From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFF6723B3 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t2P9QeZG030414; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:26:40 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jZ-BLSs_oxzu; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:26:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t2P9QPp0030395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:26:36 GMT Message-ID: <1427275585.14020.39.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Bruce Ashfield Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:26:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] linux-yocto: consolidated pull request X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:26:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 14:57 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is the latest linux-yocto consolidated pull request. It is a mix of > kernel version -stable imports (CVEs and fixes), kernel configuration > changes, a documentation update and kernel configuration enhancement. > > The -stable updates are routine, and I build/boot tested them here > (with my fixup commits being evidence). These are ready for a round of > autobuilder/soak testing. Something in here broke lttng-modules causing cascades of failures on the autobuilder so I've updated it to the latest code on the 2.6 stable branch and am retesting. Cheers, Richard