From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E58365CAC for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t3RECglv009054; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:12:42 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id p3nX19AW_ZJj; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:12:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t3RECPkQ009045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:12:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1430143945.13022.120.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Rongqing Li , Martin Jansa Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:12:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <553DF0CC.4040705@windriver.com> References: <553DF0CC.4040705@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [RFC] remove the subversion_1.6.15.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:12:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 16:18 +0800, Rongqing Li wrote: > Hi: > > there are two version subversion in oe-core, Do we have special > need on subversion 1.6.15, if not, I like to remove it > > ./meta/recipes-devtools/subversion/subversion_1.8.13.bb > ./meta/recipes-devtools/subversion/subversion_1.6.15.bb They changed the on disk format between 1.6 and 1.7 which is why we kept 1.6.x. At this point I personally think it could be removed now though. CC'ing Martin since I seem to remember he had some interest in this. Cheers, Richard