From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613473D7E for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 21:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t4GLYQnC010164; Sat, 16 May 2015 22:34:26 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FredhS_WwhgG; Sat, 16 May 2015 22:34:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t4GLYA0t010161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 16 May 2015 22:34:22 +0100 Message-ID: <1431812050.4956.5.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Robert Yang Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 22:34:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <55555B65.80600@windriver.com> References: <55555B65.80600@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [RFC] Add something like bitbake -cmenuconfig ? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 21:34:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 10:35 +0800, Robert Yang wrote: > Hello, > > Is is useful/possible if we add something like bitbake -cmenuconfig, > just like kernel's make menuconfig ? > > We can use the menuconfig to config the vars such as MACHINE, DL_DIR, > DISTRO_FEATURES, MACHINE_FEATURES and all the variables which are > configurable, I think that this would help the newbie a lot. > > I think that we can add a menuconfig.bbclass (or other names) to do this, > and I'd like to work on it. Why would you want to specify a when configuring MACHINE? I understand why you're thinking this but it isn't well thought out and in this form would confuse users more than help them. I don't think the system will even parse without a valid MACHINE, let alone execute tasks. Cheers, Richard