From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7610D60097 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:20:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpc5-cmbg17-2-0-cust97.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([86.30.112.98] helo=phil-desktop) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7Rrc-0002cT-D8; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 19:20:00 +0200 Message-ID: <1435079991.2483.418.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Darren Hart Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:19:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1435072967-10333-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com> <1435075347.11489.87.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune-i586-nlp: Add new tune file to support Quark/X1000 CPU X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:20:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:17 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > Hrm... The thing we need to avoid is quark machines accepting an i586 > package in lieu of a i586-nlp package. I don't think that's a problem here > is it? The PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS makes it so the i586-nlp package can be > used on machines that require i586, but not vice versa - correct? No, exactly the opposite to that. p.