From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913F760167 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t5QCuf4l019175; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:56:41 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KFlva5HGBENc; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:56:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t5QCuTRL019171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:56:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1435323389.10583.24.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Christopher Larson Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:56:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <7eaec2a8209ca34e5d8b247f31935af496134aea.1435299778.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sanity.bbclass: check /bin/sh is dash or bash X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:56:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 05:47 -0700, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Robert Yang > wrote: > The build would fail when /bin/sh links to ksh or csh, we only > test dash > and bash AFAIK. > > Hmm, would this break self-hosted builds, as you don’t check for > busybox, or am I missing something? Not that I’ve ever done a build > like that, other than using the old build appliance, and I don’t know > much about how that was built, but maybe someone else knows better > than I :) I think since that is a "developer" focused image it likely has bash in it so the check will probably work there (since bash has priority over ash). Good thought though. Cheers, Richard