From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C012E73231 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t62Frgqo031839; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:53:42 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VqVPljt2ukv5; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:53:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t62FrUid031831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:53:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1435852410.7287.349.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Darren Hart Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:53:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <55940F38.9060603@linux.intel.com> References: <1435587050-18517-1-git-send-email-sgw@linux.intel.com> <55940F38.9060603@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune-i586-nlp: Add new tune file to support Quark/X1000 CPU X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 15:53:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 09:03 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > +# Quark tune feature > > +AVAILTUNES = "i586-nlp-32" > > +TUNE_FEATURES_tune-i586-nlp-32 = "${TUNE_FEATURES_tune-x86} i586-nlp" > > +BASE_LIB_tune-i586-nlp-32 = "lib" > > +TUNE_PKGARCH_tune-i586-nlp-32 = "i586-nlp-32" > > +PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-i586-nlp-32 = "i586-nlp-32" > > > > I believe this explicit assignment, instead of appending to tune-i586, > addresses the issue Phil raised? Correct, this looks much better and has been merged. Cheers, Richard