From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517ED73CBD for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 23:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t6PNOYNN027131; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:27:17 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Eu5vd0tviTL2; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:27:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t6PNR2jd027233 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:27:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1437866822.821.178.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: akuster808 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 00:27:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <55B31E95.2010906@gmail.com> References: <1437723284.821.143.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <55B31E95.2010906@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] Dizzy next for .3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 23:27:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 22:28 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > On 07/24/2015 12:34 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 08:16 -0700, Armin Kuster wrote: > > We therefore need to decide whether to backport the gcc5 host fixes back > > to 1.7.3 or whether we have to disable autobuilders in order to be able > > to build it... > > I found the answer on > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Stable_branch_maintenance > > "The primary focus for stable branches is bugfixing, security updates, > and making sure that builds on recently released Ubuntu, Fedora, and > OpenSUSE distros work" > > so we should back port the gcc5 host fixes. Is that something I need to ? If we choose to do it (the above says its within policy) then someone needs to. It would certainly make life easier on the autobuilder. I've attempted the low hanging fruit with the patches in: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/log/?h=dizzy-next which get ncurses-native, cross-localedef-native and binutils-native working at least... Cheers, Richard