From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com (mail-ig0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702436AC1E for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igui7 with SMTP id i7so59053259igu.1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:05:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hNBh+f0u84AUlkLljuduH6b/+eOF3ttf8r1YBpLE6vA=; b=kJ1wPQAN6L26KVW/TtN8vei0Cas0wH5mX4GdSt9Efe+m2Xkd8OiKtAkEsUUotBosm4 HCA0AInCs/zffvbTrjL62EGNw7M33eveVUMx2q3+IzbOKM/ZTJTfiI0i+X9XpnCamWvO XoVc4K6VfE+e/j99tJUt4yQU6uFhbwRuZNYG9Fe1MBUuy7NmUgN8jj4Be2t1FTGtiu28 3uas7MJjK/447iertJ9Kw1VRaOG26Agkx4GZkLerbMfzVMbhwGW9upZyHMa0Arpjmxo2 L1gdt2UpAJXn37v9QHA6JlPeYSanH2YZGkxhMIohnEdg+KYSzKxKXVZrRRHTy2QOwk1G CbpA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkOR0HiU5v0/g/oJenCj3Rzp8zi2XAb7X82YGkEw00XLkoXvRyNdHMg6NrxrshN078DC4Mq X-Received: by 10.50.107.6 with SMTP id gy6mr12534477igb.32.1440417915409; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:05:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p57A56DBD.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.165.109.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h33sm12926436iod.23.2015.08.24.05.05.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 05:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1440417912.3543.20.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:05:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1440417012.3543.16.camel@intel.com> References: <1440417012.3543.16.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: qemu + initramfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:05:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 13:50 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Hello! > > I just tried to boot a custom image under qemu with > core-image-minimal-initramfs included in the kernel. For that, I added > to my local.conf: > > INITRAMFS_IMAGE = "core-image-minimal-initramfs" > INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE = "1" > > The extended kernel now gets built fine with the normal "bitbake > ". Speaking of qemu and core-image-minimal-initramfs, that initramfs isn't really suitable as it stands. It uses init-live-boot, which expects to boot from removable media instead of the fixed disk provided by qemu. Is there anything more suitable or do I have to roll my own init script entirely, perhaps based on initramfs-framework? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.