From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (mail-io0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B77676DDA for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iodv127 with SMTP id v127so58005474iod.3 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:08:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FiwAFKKDYWhrJMknOmq6BGBS9uFg8es1r+Uxv32F2F8=; b=Ecg4ayu6LR2zwzP3EX06CcL/qoGxDY3Eb2gcGuyXeGjx1pta9VVX/N+jwp2bCuyo3f LAhnbyQuWYqDVynH4gotsZqGXaL+gOnrdekcdNwGUqiZnwCDVoAm29m1pDjPjdVrfB9G X9K/gRKZabo0aAdC+57XkefwZ/irakHroyfPqVcS1FKR7s+eWi0HBmAHo3Owkkpmr10m Ka+cCaArRSB6Ws52MROFFZAh+se24HqXp4YfyqU4/ROdeLFAftuxzAOyfl1cqWs/3W70 otMPAeC+uJ5YW84KnnrqqO0vfM917HfchZhWnWUi/nXBQs48X+IXTt076VPa1AX7zvWO jJEw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmLpY4/JL+fFRgp0+8cnT7kexk+UsSQeb5tET1Fi5gEX48RDX/Wz2UmvWiRK3F6A6hZrj12 X-Received: by 10.107.6.14 with SMTP id 14mr11369373iog.171.1440684481847; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8F2EE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.242.238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j134sm1739426ioj.7.2015.08.27.07.08.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1440684479.3006.45.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Khem Raj Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:07:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1440605035.20082.20.camel@intel.com> <1440657827.20082.26.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mtd-utils: add xattr PACKAGECONFIG and fix acl dependency X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:08:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 06:32 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > The one in bb.utils.contains()? That is there intentionally: it's for > > the "xattr enabled" case, in which case nothing gets added to > > EXTRA_OEMAKE. > > is it required to have extra " ? > can it work without it bb.utils.contains() expects exactly 5 parameters and has no defaults, so no, that empty string cannot be omitted. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.