From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEA360043 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iofe124 with SMTP id e124so19947053iof.1 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 01:28:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KfYdBEI3q2deOfdjBpTkg5Z5k4JoVikqRmkABb8W84c=; b=iajm1sKczsO1o6r1lIJeWnvJbUADZn2biPXLGIaIbjEvVeaXimpStaIZStKTAtdGaE nhJdi4kNEXKIpiN5ctQT5uCtN3hrYpYZFNYIzlhQt68suTGwWlIZTxqTDqhkUV+VME2F IGVyQaSoUDOwEeSJ5VrbxaiHhrRqLbHYLQlwG2jQWCm0su8vr7e4YdQeTf17z6N5gRha DqT6lCPdYvFn/hIluaRV7o8tsbS76bz/JprfqIdAbEqKEedMKhsMoB70ZaVOVbrXTk0X x8MwwqBO6iAKQg8OkwgPL09rWqjoJYhV03uWXqKUaiBXHLX8zwHY392v9IIiCUhT5Vl/ qXiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDLDxj/51f5bWOkqDT4zGeMavibJuyNwXYDnzFQY/MNDXXv4CtR4bVqTmGKjj9vg0rwOS9 X-Received: by 10.107.136.69 with SMTP id k66mr13319569iod.111.1440750523445; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 01:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8F655.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.246.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b78sm3502547ioe.2.2015.08.28.01.28.42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 01:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1440750520.3006.81.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Paul Eggleton Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:28:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Add recipe whitelisting class X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:28:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 13:36 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Changes since the RFC version: > * Check BPN in addition to PN for matching, to make it easier in the > multilib case > * Use PNWHITELIST_LAYERS to specify which layers to apply whitelisting to, > and consider an empty whitelist value to be no recipes whitelisted (so > you can set up empty whitelists for layers not yet in your > configuration if you wish to do so). This also makes setting > PNWHITELIST without an override practical. > * Touch up the comments I've tried various configuration variations and it works fine now, so +1 from me. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.