From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [93.93.135.160]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D55A76FDE for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: joshuagl) with ESMTPSA id A5F09608F33 Message-ID: <1441187274.3128.6.camel@collabora.co.uk> From: Joshua Lock To: Richard Purdie , Armin Kuster Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:47:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1441139962.24871.16.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <1441139962.24871.16.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-1.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: Fido and dizzy collaboration? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 09:47:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 21:39 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > Hi Armin, Joshua, > > I've just been looking at the patches queued for the dizzy/fido > branches. In fact I ended up merging them before I realised there are > some issues. > > The problem is there are dizzy patches which aren't in fido, which > breaks our policies. Could the two of you work to resolve that and > give > me fido branch to pull which resolved it please? Sure, I'll start working on this today. Regards, Joshua