From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F34D77009 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t83FD9kj003540; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:13:09 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Y-g5jSZN7K3L; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:13:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t83FCuX9003535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:13:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1441293176.24871.118.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Joshua Lock Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:12:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <9f749745e56f33bc00d0e08dd4951840b29a557d.1441291646.git.joshua.lock@collabora.co.uk> References: <9f749745e56f33bc00d0e08dd4951840b29a557d.1441291646.git.joshua.lock@collabora.co.uk> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] systemd: remove hard-coded paths in FILES entries X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 15:13:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 15:58 +0100, Joshua Lock wrote: > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock > --- > meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_219.bb | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_219.bb b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_219.bb > index 4d32fd5..fbd86e8 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_219.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_219.bb > @@ -306,10 +306,10 @@ FILES_${PN} = " ${base_bindir}/* \ > ${exec_prefix}/lib/sysctl.d \ > ${exec_prefix}/lib/sysusers.d \ > ${localstatedir} \ > - /lib/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules \ > - /lib/udev/rules.d/71-seat.rules \ > - /lib/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules \ > - /lib/udev/rules.d/99-systemd.rules \ > + ${base_libdir}/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules \ > + ${base_libdir}/udev/rules.d/71-seat.rules \ > + ${base_libdir}/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules \ > + ${base_libdir}/udev/rules.d/99-systemd.rules \ > " > > FILES_${PN}-dbg += "${rootlibdir}/.debug ${systemd_unitdir}/.debug ${systemd_unitdir}/*/.debug ${base_libdir}/security/.debug/" > @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "systemd-serialgetty systemd-vconsole-setup \ > > PACKAGES =+ "udev-dbg udev udev-hwdb" > > -FILES_udev-dbg += "/lib/udev/.debug" > +FILES_udev-dbg += "${base_libdir}/udev/.debug" >From what I remember, this is intentional and this change likely breaks multilib. You don't want two sets of rules on a multilib system. Cheers, Richard