Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: Alex Franco <alejandro.franco@linux.intel.com>
Cc: clarson@kergoth.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] Fix recursive mode -st on BUILDDIR setup
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 09:23:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441351382.9573.50.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441351029.9573.47.camel@intel.com>

On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 09:17 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:56 -0500, Alex Franco wrote:
> > Removing recursive option from chmod -st on BUILDDIR as it would
> > take very long on existing build directories
> 
> Okay, so this *is* a problem others are also seeing ;-}
> 
> > diff --git a/scripts/oe-setup-builddir b/scripts/oe-setup-builddir
> > index f5b7e4e..91bd86b 100755
> > --- a/scripts/oe-setup-builddir
> > +++ b/scripts/oe-setup-builddir
> > @@ -24,7 +24,10 @@ if [ -z "$BUILDDIR" ]; then
> >  fi
> >  
> >  mkdir -p "$BUILDDIR/conf"
> > -chmod -R -st "$BUILDDIR" 
> > +
> > +# Attempting removal of sticky,setuid bits from BUILDDIR, BUILDDIR/conf
> > +chmod -st "$BUILDDIR" 2>/dev/null || echo "WARNING: unable to chmod $BUILDDIR"
> > +chmod -st "$BUILDDIR/conf" 2>/dev/null || echo "WARNING: unable to chmod $BUILDDIR/conf"
> >  
> >  if [ ! -d "$BUILDDIR" ]; then
> >      echo >&2 "Error: The builddir ($BUILDDIR) does not exist!"
> 
> What was the reasoning behind adding these operations on $BUILDDIR/conf
> before the check whether BUILDDIR exists and is a directory? Looks a bit
> fishy to me.

Non-existent parent of $BUILDDIR is caught elsewhere, but pointing
BUILDDIR to a file instead of a directory indeed leads to sub-optimal
error reporting:

$ touch /tmp/foobar
$ . oe-init-build-env /tmp/foobar
mkdir: cannot create directory ‘/tmp/foobar’: Not a directory
chmod: cannot access ‘/tmp/foobar/conf’: Not a directory
Error: The builddir (/tmp/foobar) does not exist!

Not sure whether it's worth fixing, though. Better get this performance
fix included quickly.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.





  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-04  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-03 21:56 [PATCHv4] Fix recursive mode -st on BUILDDIR setup Alex Franco
2015-09-04  7:17 ` Patrick Ohly
2015-09-04  7:23   ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
2015-09-04 20:20   ` Alex Franco
2015-09-23 16:13 ` [PATCH] sanity.bbclass: show warning when chmod fails Martin Jansa
2015-09-23 20:25   ` Christopher Larson
2015-09-24 13:46   ` Martin Jansa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1441351382.9573.50.camel@intel.com \
    --to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
    --cc=alejandro.franco@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=clarson@kergoth.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox