From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F96676AC5 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 20:45:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=e130.local) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYgon-0006Kq-6P; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 22:45:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1441572334.1680.77.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Steffen Sledz Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 21:45:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <55EA8F5B.408@dresearch-fe.de> References: <55E949A4.9050805@dresearch-fe.de> <55EA8F5B.408@dresearch-fe.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel , openembedded-core Subject: Re: [oe] "sub" machine types? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:45:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2015-09-05 at 08:44 +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: > What we wish is one image containing one kernel and device tree files for each product. If these devices all use the same kernel and the same rootfs then it sounds like, as far as OE is concerned, they are the same MACHINE. If you need to build device trees and different bootloaders for particular variants then you can do that easily enough with custom recipes. p.