From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4C777163 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2015 13:05:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,690,1437462000"; d="scan'208,217";a="582385246" Received: from besquive-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.219.128.95]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2015 13:05:22 -0700 Message-ID: <1445025921.6970.19.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Benjamin Esquivel To: "Burton, Ross" In-Reply-To: References: <1441921274.14702.2.camel@linux.intel.com> <1444246883-475-1-git-send-email-benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Corporation Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:05:21 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 (3.16.5-3.fc22) Cc: Paul Eggleton , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] selftest/manifest.py: Test support for manifests X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:05:27 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-tT/tvFB3aJoigU2n/ka4" --=-tT/tvFB3aJoigU2n/ka4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit this test does a one way check from the .manifest to the pkgdata dir. This test is looking for entries in the manifest that do not exist in the pkgdata dir. The bug you mention is the other way around, things that are installed in the rootfs but not listed in the manifest. I believe a test for this would be necessary too though I am not sure that the bug is a genuine error yet. Benjamin On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 17:20 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 7 October 2015 at 20:41, Benjamin Esquivel < > benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > tests added: > > - manifest.VerifyManifest.test_image_manifest_entries > > > This test case isn't exposing a known bug in the manifests, where the > installed package list and the manifest don't match, specifically the > manifest is missing the locale packages (8444). > > Ross --=-tT/tvFB3aJoigU2n/ka4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

this test does a one way check from the .manifest to the pkgdata dir. This test is looking for entries in the manifest that do not exist in the pkgdata dir. The bug you mention is the other way around, things that are installed in the rootfs but not listed in the manifest. I believe a test for this would be necessary too though I am not sure that the bug is a genuine error yet.

Benjamin

On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 17:20 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 7 October 2015 at 20:41, Benjamin Esquivel <benjamin.esquivel@linux.intel.com> wrote:
tests added:
- manifest.VerifyManifest.test_image_manifest_entries

This test case isn't exposing a known bug in the manifests, where the installed package list and the manifest don't match, specifically the manifest is missing the locale packages (8444).

Ross

--=-tT/tvFB3aJoigU2n/ka4--