From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C309D65CBD for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t9JFX1fn015603; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:34:06 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1jUNwwI1gQ7I; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:34:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t9JFXrC2015676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:34:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1445268833.17974.106.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Mark Hatle Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:33:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <562501BF.6010202@windriver.com> References: <1445264230-1126-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <562501BF.6010202@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libsdl: support native compilation X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:34:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 09:44 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 10/19/15 9:17 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > > qemu-native can use SDL backend for graphical output. Currently it is > > expected to use libsdl provided by the host. However this can lead to > > library incompatibilities between host and target. Make libsdl recipe > > support native compilation. > > I don't object to the patch.. but we did have multiple problems in the past > where libsdl (native) did not work with the host systems X11 or what-ever. > > Various failure conditions about not linking, linking to the wrong libsdl, or > execution failing are what made us prefer the host system's libsdl -- or simply > disabling libsdl altogether. This is my big worry too. I remember a lot of problems trying to build a libsdl that worked on all of the different linux distros someone might run on. Previously we found that assuming a working libsdl or disabling it was much easier. How wide has the testing if this patch series been? Cheers, Richard