From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: qemu-native build regularly failing
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:03:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447719.EOHWTkW7bb@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6bG8eV+iLQ0xmuJu=XrOn_eDEUtyp1r2KRx2TYX7xxijRJqQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 22 August 2013 15:56:39 Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> On 21 August 2013 19:33, Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 21 August 2013 01:15, Marko Lindqvist <cazfi74@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 21 August 2013 00:16, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 20 August 2013 23:26:44 Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> >>>> On 20 August 2013 16:32, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > On Tuesday 20 August 2013 15:51:21 Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> >>>> >> Build of qemu-native regularly fails with:
> >>>> >> | LINK sh4-softmmu/qemu-system-sh4
> >>>> >> |
> >>>> >> | /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXext.so.6: undefined reference to
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> `_XEatDataWords'
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> | collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> This might be some dependency missing, as building first some
> >>>> >> packets
> >>>> >> (+ more importantly their dependencies) that do not depend on qemu
> >>>> >> and
> >>>> >> only then qemu dependant image success.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Do you have something else causing libxext-native to be built by any
> >>>> > chance?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, it seems to be difference between the tree where build fails and
> >>>>
> >>>> the one where build success that former has no libxext-native built.
> >>>> Further, I tested just building libxext-native before building
> >>>> qemu-native, and then the build succeded.
> >>>
> >>> The problem is we want qemu-native to be buildable both on systems
> >>> without X11 and systems with X11, so the dependency has to be floating,
> >>> and this is more or less acceptable for a native recipe - there's only
> >>> a problem when libxext- native needs to be built. I can't see a lot of
> >>> value in building libxext- native in any case - what is causing it to
> >>> be built on your system?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Paul
> >>>
> >> I'm still running more tests - this seems to be complicated matter.
> >>
> >> For one, I just got successful build from empty tree by building
> >> qemu-native directly. That was build targeted to arm, while failing
> >> builds have been for x86 (native is amd64). Also, I think (but cannot
> >> be 100% sure any more) build has succeeded on trees where nothing
> >> depends on libxext-native but still *something* was needed to be built
> >> before qemu-native.
> >>
> > It seems libxext-native is not needed. Rather this seems like problem
> >
> > with build parallelism.
> >
> > - Sometimes "bitbake qemu-native" to empty tree success at once
> > - When it first fails (but other tasks get executed while it tries to
> >
> > build), it then success by forcing configure rerun & building (
> > "bitbake qemu-native -c configure -f && bitbake qemu-native" )
> >
> > I think next step is to get config.log of the succesful and failed
> >
> > build to compare.
>
> --- success-qemu/qemu-1.5.0/config-host.h 2013-08-22
> 15:45:10.323126880 +0300
> +++ failed-qemu/qemu-1.5.0/config-host.h 2013-08-22
> 15:32:23.515101072 +0300
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #define CONFIG_UUID 1
> #define QEMU_VERSION "1.5.0"
> #define QEMU_PKGVERSION ""
> +#define CONFIG_SDL 1
> #define CONFIG_CURSES 1
> #define CONFIG_ATFILE 1
> #define CONFIG_UTIMENSAT 1
> @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@
> #define CONFIG_MADVISE 1
> #define CONFIG_POSIX_MADVISE 1
> #define CONFIG_SIGEV_THREAD_ID 1
> +#define CONFIG_GLX 1
> #define CONFIG_UNAME_RELEASE ""
> #define CONFIG_ZERO_MALLOC 1
> #define CONFIG_QOM_CAST_DEBUG 1
>
>
> As this diff is success -> failed, CONFIG_GLX and CONFIG_SDL are
> defined on first build ending to failure, but not on forced
> reconfigure that then build succesfully.
You'd probably need to dig into the actual configure check that enables these
automatically. I was about to suggest maybe libsdl-native was present in the
failing case, but then the current libsdl recipe in OE-Core doesn't provide
libsdl-native so that probably isn't it...
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-20 12:51 qemu-native build regularly failing Marko Lindqvist
2013-08-20 13:32 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-08-20 20:26 ` Marko Lindqvist
2013-08-20 21:16 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-08-20 21:24 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-08-20 21:26 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-08-20 22:15 ` Marko Lindqvist
2013-08-21 16:33 ` Marko Lindqvist
2013-08-22 12:56 ` Marko Lindqvist
2013-08-22 13:03 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-08-22 14:27 ` Saul Wold
2013-08-30 2:25 ` Marko Lindqvist
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1447719.EOHWTkW7bb@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cazfi74@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox