From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFD760118 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a00:14f0:e04c:1:e23f:49ff:fe47:b7fd] (helo=phil-desktop) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zz5iH-0007EQ-6h; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:36:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1447864564.1472.52.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Martin Jansa , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:36:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <018bb1afb653b342e39f2d9c7a14645913c554ae.1447757562.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> References: <018bb1afb653b342e39f2d9c7a14645913c554ae.1447757562.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 09/16] cortexa{7,15,17}: add VFPv4 tunes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:36:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 11:58 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > * it was added only to hf cortexa7 in: > commit e97d152ca13556b41a236c1a4cfb11e77ff857d7 > Author: Kristof Robot > Date: Sun Jan 26 10:03:56 2014 +0100 > > Add Cortex A7 support for NEONv2 & FPv4 > > * add it to softfp cortexa7 and both versions for cortexa15 and > cortexa17 tunes I can't say I'm wildly thrilled about the combinatorial explosion of tunes that differ only in a few letters. Can't we just enable NEON and VFPv4 under the existing cortex-a15 tune? Those ISAs are both part of the Cortex-A15 cpu, right? Also... > * we should also update Cortex-A7 and Cortex-A15, to use > -march=armv7ve, > but the problem is that oe-core has gcc-4.[89] and gcc-5.2 and gcc > -4.8 > doesn't support it yet, maybe we should do this change after gcc > -4.8 > is removed, for details see: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57907 ... this part of the commit message is superseded by the following patch, right? p.