From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6F06012C for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbxm8 with SMTP id xm8so36145022igb.1 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:27:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zx4Aw1ZKLxl0afw92e9g9QZ06PdM54L6xWrJXgo5HI0=; b=hSpSNk9rta2wlZyY1LVn+C13k8kgyTQo+hYctQteTt7sXG5dsRBNCKYaDPM2M4I/vx cK3z41f4Sv5QS8U5SnjHbNoKv6hf/KRsfEZkDQOAHMczN8nN9N1+NVvHhi8Rc493tUfD g/Fp4LSrKApJT9daKCjfLtAXHnR0rI3TgjeQ93gMeMxNK3bj50KnVhxN6XgohG3XHOnq u7i9JOIprChdMedqqYm6rewqLcjJi8q/m4GreG4b3YEiAQhXOuF8I9tMTxzSHdwgudST XamJPBpqC6lmelvuG6/KW/NDd0o44/rg6H/SDpPvmgzT+Qjn3Kgu19E2rH7BF+TAeIzy ATCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zx4Aw1ZKLxl0afw92e9g9QZ06PdM54L6xWrJXgo5HI0=; b=FEa6JixAcYDRpx+Fxk2CF4b5C3mydDYFLYeBpHSSwe6M08pI5bni/p9ZNz83eM4Vm9 ZgHwl3QSaN2v7V1m+ozN1i6GxettS7WLKH1Jr2AnGt7HKsyKyxmoSeH7Z/FaJ4eLwEgT HttL4gB01Oo53fx+Di9kOgYOncTAR1boMuJ9YuBR4FujHWVttxzNPA9vDNE+gr074rwx OmIHmjJU54mZ0hkFCEdzHWzj0teBEkl+gO3xdboiFNpAm3w10ZQuwqdcw26uG61mZUv7 tJ5AS8KxsO9rOZDarJ6AD20cNpkVHINB5dpXViF6DgX7YfH1j/Ulm3DFjYdt7t46mH/V swKg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmpF3ZLCdb/zgzoB32j/zeCeHBZBRedk4/KWllJiscSg3zW2RwHID6c+l3xLlTHfLnDFSea X-Received: by 10.50.82.97 with SMTP id h1mr31142966igy.67.1449073643182; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:27:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DC4A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.220.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 75sm1402166ios.35.2015.12.02.08.27.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:27:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1449073639.10734.65.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Andrew Shadura Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:27:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dbus: merge .bb and .inc X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:27:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 15:27 +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote: > The split is no longer necessary, and only makes it more complicated to > do changes in external layers. I'm not sure about the "more complicated to do changes in external layers". Why is that? Quite the opposite, I found it useful that the version independent build rules (*) were in a .inc file and relied on including that .inc file in a "dbus-cynara" recipe which builds a specific fork of the source code [2]. But I understand that this is an unusual usage of OE-core. As I didn't notice the change in time (it's in master now), I'll just copy the previous content of dbus.inc. (*) However, a recent change in dizzy and fido already broke that separation when adding a patch for 1.8.2 to the .inc file instead of dbus-1.8.2.bb. [1] http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=a8aa06b2405dec31a306fdf47bd1fdf740fde7bd [2] https://github.com/01org/meta-intel-iot-security/blob/7026d6e8e1084def0ebf203799360b54b5ac2763/meta-security-framework/recipes-core/dbus/dbus-cynara_1.8.18.bb -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.