From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F7D607AB for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 01:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oiww189 with SMTP id w189so19045837oiw.3 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:10:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=C/Sx1hkVSSlP61PanaF5WxPdvfuxRbIMoynsJMwUaU4=; b=xV4R6iL+Ro+Nw5UW4y9sBrXDTKZlzXKmeZTfjD+uDz/MSsN4A+vIPN86GeXSEOWLgO P5ORzrWrbrYJZ1HrRqazHA8wkrv5q/8CoIy9kW7k/jea98Z+8ggaL+QK413OzzNF2C29 YsNqWQmnpJ0ZPGqlQmQR6M0K4xhpcuHhE/9OLm8DrvF/R5NiPwElPeMAL49k4gUjf9O6 AkZNOrMWuFfdwSI9Eq1zrFqjURtbCIvN6XsIFe9lyoCeUx/sTtr4oSbs1YJ+cw9fKf5k Tphft8MNluJufCg8xSkq4MJ50t7dRtfKIXF0+7E5wMAsbQ2ExF/Vi/e/YiNf0I8vg3BK d4KQ== X-Received: by 10.202.81.87 with SMTP id f84mr2194288oib.0.1449623408423; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:10:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from e6520.cablelabs.com (50-204-102-64-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.204.102.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t84sm2540098oie.1.2015.12.08.17.10.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:10:07 -0800 (PST) From: Andre McCurdy To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:09:56 -0800 Message-Id: <1449623398-29127-2-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1449623398-29127-1-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> References: <1449623398-29127-1-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] feature-arm-thumb.inc: drop ARM -vs- thumb comments X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 01:10:10 -0000 Comments are old and specific to thumb1. Since oe-core CPU tuning files aren't really the right place to fully document ARM -vs- thumb, drop the comments instead of trying to update them. Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy --- meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc index 5632171..0a9545c 100644 --- a/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc +++ b/meta/conf/machine/include/arm/feature-arm-thumb.inc @@ -1,9 +1,3 @@ -# The instruction set the compiler should use when generating application -# code. The kernel is always compiled with arm code at present. arm code -# is the original 32 bit ARM instruction set, thumb code is the 16 bit -# encoded RISC sub-set. Thumb code is smaller (maybe 70% of the ARM size) -# but requires more instructions (140% for 70% smaller code) so may be -# slower. TUNEVALID[thumb] = "Use thumb instructions instead of ARM" ARM_THUMB_OPT = "${@['arm', 'thumb'][d.getVar('ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET', True) == 'thumb']}" ARM_THUMB_SUFFIX .= "${@bb.utils.contains('TUNE_FEATURES', 'armv4', 't', '', d)}" -- 1.9.1