From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3AE601D3; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id tBFHDbG1006898; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:13:37 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7mQENDKPZtnd; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:13:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id tBFHDQU7006875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:13:32 GMT Message-ID: <1450199606.13505.79.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Philip Balister , Mariano Lopez , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-architecture Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:13:26 +0000 In-Reply-To: <567044A7.8050505@balister.org> References: <567039E1.5000205@linux.intel.com> <5670400E.6030201@balister.org> <1450197453.13505.72.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <567044A7.8050505@balister.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] Mark of upstream CVE patches X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:13:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 11:49 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > On 12/15/2015 11:37 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 11:30 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: > > > I also suggest copying the > > > > > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-security > > > > > > list. > > > > and the architecture list, this is something that should apply to > > more > > than OE-Core ideally. > > I thought the exact same thing seconds after hitting send. I'll let > the > security and architecture people decide which list is best for > discussion. > > What I do want to see is fewer discussions cross posted across many > lists. Agreed, right now I just want people to get thinking about the right place for some of these discussions to happen too though. I suspect the right place is architecture since we're likely going to want to update the patch submission guidelines and reach a wide audience with this. I believe Mariano will repost onto the architecture list and anyone interested can join in there. Cheers, Richard