From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EB6731EA; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u06N4LAt023853; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:04:59 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id roR9hKD6ZBvt; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:04:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u06N4rRI023883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:04:54 GMT Message-ID: <1452121493.7598.101.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Paul Eggleton Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:04:53 +0000 In-Reply-To: <3002291.NNtibCZEiD@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1451307640.4129.16.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <3002291.NNtibCZEiD@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core Subject: Re: RFC: Split do_rootfs into image specific tasks? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:05:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:30 +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > I like this a lot. I'd idly considered this model before (as I'm sure > others > had) as it simplifies a lot of the multi-format image construction > handling, > improves incremental performance, and the added granularity makes it > slightly > easier to see what the build system is doing. Obviously there is some > minor > cleanup work to be done on the patchset as you've noted. > > The only "issue" I can think of is that bitbake -c rootfs will no > longer build > the image files as it did previously; however I'm not sure I'd > structure things > any differently to avoid that though. I suspect people will fairly > easily adapt > to this change as long as we publicise it effectively. Thanks for the feedback. Just as a heads up for people, I posted an updated patch set to the OE-Core list. This one has various issues fixed (including the todos) and is ready for wider testing. Cheers, Richard